As imperial powers expanded their influence throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, anti-colonial movements emerged in response to economic exploitation, cultural suppression, and political domination. These movements often drew upon nationalist sentiments, religious traditions, and historical grievances to mobilize resistance against European and imperial rule. Resistance took many forms, including armed rebellions, political movements, and efforts to preserve indigenous traditions in defiance of colonial authority.
One of the key driving forces behind anti-colonial resistance was nationalism, which encouraged people in colonized regions to see themselves as part of a unified national identity rather than as subjects of a foreign empire. Many of these movements sought to restore sovereignty, preserve cultural heritage, and resist economic exploitation. While some rebellions were spontaneous uprisings, others were organized resistance movements with clear leadership and long-term goals. Religious ideologies also played a role, with many indigenous movements incorporating spiritual or religious justifications for their resistance against imperial forces.
One of the earliest large-scale revolts against colonial rule was Túpac Amaru II’s Rebellion (1780–1782) in Peru, where indigenous Andean peoples rose up against Spanish colonial authorities. The rebellion was fueled by high taxes, forced labor policies, and the economic marginalization of indigenous communities. Although Túpac Amaru II and his forces briefly gained control over parts of the Andes, the Spanish suppressed the rebellion with extreme brutality, executing thousands of indigenous fighters and their families. However, the memory of the rebellion lived on and inspired later independence movements in Latin America during the early 19th century.
What factors contributed to the rise of anti-colonial resistance movements?
How did nationalism play a role in uniting groups against imperial rule?
How did Túpac Amaru II’s rebellion challenge Spanish colonial rule in Peru?
Many resistance movements engaged in direct armed conflict against colonial powers, using a combination of traditional military tactics, guerrilla warfare, and European weaponry to challenge imperial rule. While some of these movements were ultimately defeated, they often delayed European conquest or forced colonial authorities to change policies in response to prolonged resistance.
In West Africa, Samory Touré led an extended military campaign against French forces in the 1880s and 1890s, resisting French expansion into modern-day Mali and Guinea. Touré, a skilled military strategist and leader of the Wassoulou Empire, built a professional army equipped with European firearms and waged a guerrilla war against French colonial forces. Despite his initial success in defending his territory, the French eventually captured Touré in 1898, marking the end of one of the last major African resistance movements against European conquest.
In West Africa’s Gold Coast (modern-day Ghana), Queen Yaa Asantewaa of the Asante Empire led a fierce resistance movement against British colonial forces in 1900. The Yaa Asantewaa War (also called the War of the Golden Stool) erupted after British officials attempted to seize the sacred Golden Stool, a symbol of Asante sovereignty. Yaa Asantewaa rallied Asante warriors to defend their land and resisted British military advances for several months. Although the British eventually captured and exiled her, the war became a symbol of African resistance against imperial domination and inspired later nationalist movements in Ghana.
One of the largest anti-colonial uprisings of the 19th century was the Indian Rebellion of 1857 (also called the Sepoy Rebellion), in which Indian soldiers (sepoys) in the British East India Company’s army revolted against British rule. The rebellion was sparked by cultural and religious grievances, including the introduction of rifle cartridges greased with cow and pig fat, which violated Hindu and Muslim religious beliefs. However, the underlying causes of the rebellion included resentment over British economic policies, land confiscation, and racial discrimination. The rebellion quickly spread across northern and central India, with both soldiers and civilians joining the fight. Although the British eventually crushed the uprising, the rebellion led to major political changes, including the dissolution of the British East India Company and the establishment of direct British rule over India in 1858.
How did resistance movements use both traditional and European military tactics against imperial forces?
What role did indigenous leadership play in direct resistance efforts?
How did figures like Samory Touré, Yaa Asantewaa, and the Sepoy Rebellion contribute to anti-colonial struggles?
As imperial powers expanded their influence in the 19th century, some groups sought to establish their own states on the edges of empires. These newly formed states often arose in response to colonial encroachment, acting as buffer zones or centers of resistance against European domination. Some of these new states emerged through military conquests, while others relied on diplomacy and strategic alliances to secureautonomy. These states played an essential role in shaping resistance movements a nd preserving local cultures in the face of imperial expansion.
One example of an Islamic resistance state was the Sokoto Caliphate (1804–1903) in present-day Nigeria. Founded by Usman dan Fodio, the Sokoto Caliphate emerged from a Fulani-led jihad movement that sought to reform Islam and overthrow corrupt local rulers. The caliphate became one of West Africa’s largest Islamic empires, unifying numerous Hausa and Fulani states under a centralized theocratic government. However, despite its military strength and religious cohesion, the Sokoto Caliphate eventually fell to British colonial forces in the early 20th century, marking the end of one of Africa’s last great independent Islamic states.
In Southern Africa, the Zulu Kingdom (1816–1879), under the leadership of Shaka Zulu, emerged as a powerful state that resisted British and Boer (Dutch settler) expansion. Shaka revolutionized Zulu military tactics, introducing innovative weapons (such as the iklwa spear), new battle formations, and rigorous warrior training. These military strategies enabled the Zulu to defeat rival African states and European forces in multiple conflicts. However, increasing British aggression and a series of wars, particularly the Anglo-Zulu War (1879), led to the eventual defeat and incorporation of the Zulu Kingdom into the British colony of Natal.
Another significant example of a state resisting imperial expansion was the Cherokee Nation in the southeastern United States. Throughout the early 19th century, the Cherokee engaged in legal and political efforts to maintain sovereignty in the face of U.S. expansion. The Cherokee adopted European-stylegovernance, created a written constitution, and even developed their own writing system (Sequoyah’s Cherokee syllabary). However, despite these efforts to assimilate and protect their land, the U.S. government forcibly removed the Cherokee in the 1830s during the Trail of Tears, leading to the deaths of thousands and the loss of their homeland.
In the Balkans, nationalist movements led to the creation of new independent states, particularly as the Ottoman Empire weakened. Inspired by nationalism and self-determination, groups in Greece, Serbia, and Bulgaria launched uprisings against Ottoman rule. The Greek War of Independence (1821–1830), supported by European powers like Britain, France, and Russia, resulted in the establishment of an independent Greek state in 1830. Similarly, Serbia gained autonomy in 1817 and full independence in 1878 following prolonged resistance and military efforts against Ottoman forces. These newly independent states reshaped the political landscape of the Balkans and further weakened Ottoman control over Europe.
Sokoto Caliphate (1804–1903)
Zulu Kingdom (1816–1879)
Cherokee Nation (1819-1838)
How did new states form as a response to imperial expansion?
What were some of the key strategies used to establish independent states on the edges of empires?
How did states like the Sokoto Caliphate, Zulu Kingdom, and Balkan States resist foreign influence?
Many resistance movements against imperialism were driven by religious beliefs, as colonized peoples saw foreign rule as a spiritual and moral threat. Faith-based rebellions often framed anti-colonial struggles as holy wars or divine missions, drawing upon prophecies, religious symbolism, and traditional belief systems to mobilize support. These movements varied in their outcomes—some escalated into full-scale wars, while others ended in mass persecution and suffering.
One of the most well-known indigenous spiritual resistance movements was the Ghost Dance Movement (United States, 1890), which spread among Native American tribes in response to U.S. expansion and cultural suppression. The movement, led by the Paiute prophet Wovoka, promised that through ritualistic dances and spiritual purification, Native Americans would see the return of their ancestors, the disappearance of white settlers, and the restoration of their lands. The U.S. government viewed the movement as a threat to federal authority, culminating in the Wounded Knee Massacre (1890), where U.S. soldiers killed nearly 300 Lakota men, women, and children, effectively ending large-scale indigenous resistance in the Great Plains.
In South Africa, the Xhosa Cattle-Killing Movement (1856–1857) was a faith-based response to British colonization. A teenage Xhosa prophet, Nongqawuse, claimed that if the Xhosa people slaughtered their cattle and destroyed their crops, their ancestors would return to drive out the British and restore Xhosa dominance. Many Xhosa followed her prophecy, leading to the mass slaughter of thousands of cattle, which resulted in a devastating famine. British colonial authorities took advantage of the crisis, further subjugating the Xhosa people and consolidating colonial rule over their lands.
In Sudan, the Mahdist Wars (1881–1898) were led by Muhammad Ahmad, a religious leader who declared himself the Mahdi, a prophesied Islamic savior destined to purify Islam and overthrow foreign rulers. The Mahdi’s forces defeated Egyptian and British forces, capturing Khartoum in 1885 and establishing a short-lived Mahdist state in Sudan. However, following Ahmad’s death, his successor struggled to maintain control, and by 1898, Anglo-Egyptian forces reconquered Sudan, crushing the Mahdist movement.
These faith-based revolts highlight the intersection of religion and resistance during the age of imperialism. Whether through spiritual revitalization, prophecies, or jihad, many colonized peoples found hope and unity in religious movements, even as European powers sought to suppress them.
In this activity, you will participate in a structured, turn-based discussion focused on the reading. You will sit in a circle or small group and respond to discussion prompts one at a time. Each student is expected to contribute at least once per prompt and to build on classmates’ ideas using specific evidence from the reading (primary and secondary sources).
Come prepared with notes and marked evidence. During the discussion, listen actively, speak respectfully, and keep your responses concise and focused on the text. The goal is not to “win” the discussion, but to deepen understanding by considering multiple perspectives and supporting claims with historical evidence.
How did religious movements inspire resistance to colonial rule?
What were some of the major faith-based rebellions, and how did they challenge imperial authority?
How did movements like the Ghost Dance, Xhosa Cattle-Killing Movement, and Mahdist Wars impact indigenous and colonial societies?
Using the information from this lesson, create a thinking map that classifies how and why indigenous peoples and states responded differently to imperial expansion between 1750 and 1900.
Organize your thinking map around the following three main methods of response:
Direct resistance
Faith-based resistance
Formation of new states
For each method, include specific historical examples and evidence that explain how the response worked and why it was used.
Complete this assignment digitally or on paper. This assignment will be collected in your portfolio.
Why did indigenous peoples respond to imperial expansion in different ways between 1750 and 1900? (consider political authority, access to resources, and external pressures).?
How did direct resistance to imperialism reflect both internal and external factors within indigenous societies?
How did religion help mobilize resistance, and what limitations did it create?
In what ways did the formation of new states challenge imperial control, and in what ways were they constrained?
To what extent was indigenous resistance successful in slowing, altering, or shaping imperial expansion? Why?
How did growing nationalism and questions about political authority contribute to anticolonial movements during this period?